My
most profound hope is that the “private magic” of my
studio will become part of our collective inheritance. Archetypal,
political, cultural and personal myths give us fragmented insights
into the underlying patterns we move along. Art, when it works,
will reflect, confront and, when necessary, change those patterns.
Nine years ago I was in Italy, and when
you are vacationing in Italy, going to Museums and churches, you are
completely surrounded by Mary. It's all Madonnas, all the time. One
night I had a dream that took the form of a slide show and each slide
was an attribute of Mary: a crown of stars, a mirror, a spindle, a
book, lilies, a rose, many others. A voice said "You should
go home and do art about the bad girls of the bible. You should
portray Eve, Jezebel and Salome and give them the glory of Mary".
My first thought at waking up and remembering the dream was "gosh,
that seems kind of blasphemous!"
Taking in those glorious paintings and images of the Virgin during
the day I was also encountering a fundamental teaching of patriarchal
religious institutions-- and that teaching is that all women are either
bad girls or good girls. Further, the teaching is that good girls
deserve to be loved and revered, like Mary and bad girls deserve to
suffer, like Eve, to be despised, like Salome or perhaps even to be
devoured by dogs, like Jezebel. My dream seeks to compensate
for this dualistic teaching by mixing up the categories of good and
bad, by giving symbols of virtue and grace to some "bad girls".
I took direction from the dream and I am now deep into a series of
works, called Female Personae that use clothing forms to explore
the personae of “good” and “bad” women. Some
pieces in the series use evocative materials, such as old Wonder Woman
comics or vintage books, to tailor garments in fashions and forms that
I find iconic. Other pieces incorporate emblematic garments that
I have altered, or perhaps defaced and embedded in paper pulp or resin. By
using, or alluding to, archetypally feminine attire taken from the
19th. and 20th. centuries I can consider the cultural personae that
confine or empower or confuse women (sometimes simultaneously). These
works are the dramatis personae of imagined biographies, narratives
of women’s more hidden experiences. Some pieces in “female
personae” are also autobiographical, springing from personal
memory or from dreams. When successful, such pieces make an internal,
layered reality of mine accessible to the viewer.
With my artists’ books and altered
books I want to push the viewer/reader towered seeing the book as a
sculptural object with a force of its own, an object that must be approached
through a process of engagement.
In the 80's I went to Japan and took
papermaking lessons from traditional paper-makers. I bought a
number of handmade accordion books while there. Certainly I had
heard of artists' books and seen a few in reproduction but I think
that these traditional Japanese books, which were so beautiful, simple
and accessible, first gave me the sense that the book was a form I
could play with. I made my first artists' book in 1992.
In 2004 I began to make Altered Books,
an art form defined by the International Society of Altered Book Artists
as “any book, old or new that has been recycled by creative means
into a work of art”. I have expanded that definition to include
sculptures and collages constructed from any commercially published
materials. Using books as material is especially tempting because i
know that most viewers will have a reaction to seeing an altered book. When
I deconstruct a book and use its parts as the basis of a piece, I am
counting on the fact that this will give me the viewer’ s attention. I
am shamelessly appropriating the author’s efforts, subverting
her intentions and converting both to my own storyline.
Books, as objects, have conflicting associations. On
one hand books are common, easily obtainable, and, with desktop printing,
easily produced, tools. They are typically viewed and treated
as a means to an end (obtaining information or entertainment) rather
than as objects in their own right At the same time, books retain
some of the talismanic aura that scarcity, expense and the elite nature
of literacy itself gave them in past centuries. To see this demonstrated,
simply stand in front of a group of people and willfully damage a book,
any book. The majority reaction of your audience will let you
know that you have transgressed. Some of that reaction also springs
from the way Western culture has been shaped and influenced by the
religions of “The Book”, Judaism and Christianity.
Also, I make stuff because it’s
fun. The book I am currently writing--Joy in the Making:
Artists’ Dreams and the Recovery of Delight in Art-Making--represents
my exploration of the ways in which that fun is destroyed and may be
recovered.